The profile evaluation tables in Section B of this survey use a very simple measure of the difference between a given RGB working space profile's primaries and Lindbloom's adapted primaries, which is the sum of the absolute difference between the profile's actual red, green, and blue xyY values and Lindbloom's red, green, and blue xyY values. Does the profile have the right black point?.Did the profile maker use the source white point given in the profile specs?.Excepting intentionally different TRCs, such as a linear gamma version of a standard RGB working space, does the profile have the correct tone response curves? Can the profile be used in unbounded mode ICC profile conversions?.How far does the profile deviate from being neutral?.How closely do the profile's red, green and blue primaries match the theoretically correct values? Do any of the floss profiles deviate 'too far' from their theoretical values?.This survey uses the following criteria for evaluating floss RGB working space profiles: Procedure for evaluating the quality of floss ICC RGB working space profiles Different ICC specs + different software + different white points = many variants of nominally the same floss RGB working space profile:.Floss RGB working space profile evaluations: Which ones you can trust, which ones to avoid, which ones are closest to selected reference profiles.

Procedure for evaluating the quality of floss ICC RGB working space profiles.This survey assesses the current state (as of January 2014) of free and open source ('floss') ICC RGB working space profiles by comparing and evaluating available floss versions of the four most widely used image editing profiles: AdobeRGB-compatible, ProPhotoRGB, WideGamutRGB, and sRGB.

Prophoto rgb icc profile download